James Hampton, a former Salisbury Police Department officer who resigned in 2021 following a viral video involving his K-9 partner, has been sworn in as a deputy with the Union County Sheriff’s Office. His hiring has sparked widespread criticism and raised questions about accountability and public trust in law enforcement.
Background in Salisbury
In March 2021, a video circulated online showing then-Officer Hampton handling K-9 Zuul in a way that drew national attention. The footage captured Hampton lifting the dog by its collar, swinging it, slamming it against a patrol vehicle, and striking it. An internal investigation by the Salisbury Police Department determined Hampton’s actions were “entirely inconsistent” with department policy. Although the department recommended termination, Hampton resigned before he could be dismissed.
Despite public outcry, prosecutors declined to file criminal charges, ruling that the incident did not meet the threshold for prosecution.
Sworn in at Union County
In August 2025, Hampton officially joined the Union County Sheriff’s Office as a deputy. The announcement was made on the department’s social media channels, where the swearing-in ceremony photos quickly drew backlash from community members who recalled Hampton’s history in Salisbury.
Public Reaction
The decision to hire Hampton has prompted criticism from both advocacy groups and residents:
- The National Police Accountability Project called the hire a step backward for accountability in policing.
- PETA condemned the decision, stating, “There is no scenario where hitting and slamming and choking a dog is called for.”
- Residents questioned the standards of the sheriff’s office and expressed concern about Hampton’s ability to serve the community fairly.
Sheriff’s Office Response
The Union County Sheriff’s Office has stood by its decision, stating that Hampton has their full confidence to serve professionally. Officials also acknowledged the community reaction but defended the hiring process, emphasizing their belief in his qualifications.
Larger Implications
Hampton’s return to law enforcement highlights an ongoing debate over second chances and accountability. Supporters argue that officers who make mistakes should be given opportunities for rehabilitation, while critics contend that prior misconduct should disqualify individuals from future service in policing roles.
The case underscores broader questions about transparency in law enforcement hiring and how agencies balance redemption with maintaining public trust.